Hello there,

In today’s edition:

• Adductor strengthening in female football players

• Home advantage in handball by sex and team level

• Impact of the menstrual cycle on women's fitness

• Sleep and performance in Division I athletes

• Effects of compression garments on recovery

• Health issues in young Danish handball players

and several more…

In focus: The Role of Adductor Strengthening Exercises in Female Football

Strengthening the adductor muscles has emerged as a critical component in injury prevention and performance enhancement for female football players, with mounting evidence supporting its effectiveness in reducing groin injuries by up to 41%. The Copenhagen Adduction Exercise has gained particular recognition as the gold standard intervention, with recent systematic reviews demonstrating significant improvements in eccentric hip adduction strength when performed 2-3 times per week for 8 weeks.

Recent research reveals that the Copenhagen exercise addresses a fundamental weakness in traditional training programs, as standard FIFA 11+ protocols fail to adequately strengthen hip adductors. A 2025 meta-analysis of 148 soccer players showed that Copenhagen Adduction Exercise interventions increased eccentric hip adduction strength by 0.49 Nm/kg compared to control groups, representing a clinically meaningful improvement in protective strength capacity.

The injury prevention benefits extend beyond strength gains alone. Cluster-randomized controlled trials involving 652 male players demonstrated that teams implementing the Adductor Strengthening Programme experienced a 13.5% groin problem prevalence compared to 21.3% in control groups. While most research focuses on male athletes, emerging evidence suggests similar protective benefits for female players, particularly when exercises are integrated into comprehensive training programs.

For optimal implementation, practitioners should focus on progressive loading protocols that minimize delayed onset muscle soreness while maximizing compliance. The exercise targets the often-neglected eccentric strength component that provides crucial protection during rapid direction changes and high-intensity movements characteristic of football. This evidence-based approach represents a paradigm shift from reactive injury treatment to proactive strength-based prevention strategies specifically designed for the unique biomechanical demands faced by female football players.

^{A message from our sponsor}

Unmatched Quality. Proven Results. Momentous Creatine.

Creatine is one of the most effective and well-researched supplements for improving strength, power, recovery, and cognitive performance. Momentous Creatine contains Creapure®—the purest, pharmaceutical-grade creatine monohydrate—single-sourced from Germany for unmatched quality and consistency. Every batch is NSF Certified for Sport®, meaning it’s independently tested for safety, label accuracy, and banned substances.

With no fillers, no artificial additives, and clinically validated dosing, it embodies The Momentous Standard™—a commitment to science-backed formulas, transparency, and uncompromising quality. This is why it’s trusted by professional teams, Olympic athletes, and the U.S. military’s top performers.

Whether you’re starting your creatine journey or returning after a break, Momentous Creatine gives you the confidence of knowing you’re fueling your body with the very best—precisely formulated for results you can feel and trust.

Head to livemomentous.com and use code HIVE for up to 35% off your first order.

Elevate Your Performance

Python Coding Challenge: Analyzing Training Load Patterns

Training load represents the total amount of physical and physiological stress placed on an athlete during training sessions and competitions. Think of it like measuring how hard your body is working - similar to how a fitness tracker measures your daily activity. For sports scientists and coaches, tracking training load is crucial because it helps prevent overtraining injuries, optimize performance peaks, and ensure athletes recover properly between sessions.

In professional sports, training load is measured using various metrics like heart rate, perceived exertion scales, or specialized monitoring devices. By analyzing patterns in this data, coaches can make informed decisions about when to push harder, when to ease up, and how to structure training programs for maximum benefit.

The Challenge

In this exercise, you'll learn to analyze training load data using Python programming. We'll start with basic calculations and then expand our analysis to provide more comprehensive insights for sports performance monitoring.

# This line creates a new function called 'calculate_average_load'
def calculate_average_load(loads):
    # This function takes a list of numbers (training loads) as input
    # The 'if loads else 0' part checks if the list has any numbers in it
    # If yes, it adds all numbers together with sum() and divides by count with len()
    # If the list is empty, it returns 0 to avoid errors
    return sum(loads) / len(loads) if loads else 0

# This line creates a new function called 'count_high_load' 
def count_high_load(loads, threshold):
    # This function counts how many training sessions exceeded a danger threshold
    # It looks at each number in the 'loads' list one by one
    # For each number higher than the threshold, it counts it (adds 1)
    # The sum() function adds up all the 1's to get the total count
    return sum(1 for load in loads if load > threshold)

# This line creates a list (like a shopping list) of training load numbers
# Each number represents the intensity of one training session
training_loads = [12, 15, 10, 20, 18, 11]

# This line calculates the average by calling our first function
# It passes our training_loads list to the function and stores the result
average_load = calculate_average_load(training_loads)

# This line counts dangerous high-intensity sessions above level 15
# It passes both our data and the threshold number 15 to the function
high_load_count = count_high_load(training_loads, 15)

# This line displays both results together
# Calculation: (12+15+10+20+18+11) ÷ 6 = 86 ÷ 6 = 14.33
# High load count: 20, 18 are above 15, so count = 2
print(f"Average training load: {average_load:.2f}")
print(f"High-intensity sessions (>15): {high_load_count}")
average_load, high_load_count

Your Task:

Expand this analysis by adding the ability to find the lowest and highest training load values. This will give coaches a complete picture of training intensity ranges - from the easiest recovery sessions to the most demanding high-intensity workouts.

💻 Launch This Project in Colab

Open the interactive Google Colab notebook for today's project — with full instructions, hints, and solutions to the extension task.

^{A message from our sponsor}

The Gold standard for AI news

AI will eliminate 300 million jobs in the next 5 years.

Yours doesn't have to be one of them.

Here's how to future-proof your career:

• Join the Superhuman AI newsletter - read by 1M+ professionals

• Learn AI skills in 3 mins a day

• Become the AI expert on your team

Start learning AI now

🏆 The Surprising Truth About Home Advantage in Handball

Key finding:

Male handball teams benefit more from home advantage and winning percentages than female teams, especially at lower competition levels.

How they did it:

• Methodology: The study analyzed 3,902 matches over 10 seasons from the Spanish men's (ASOBAL) and women's (Guerreras) handball leagues, excluding the COVID-19 affected season. Home advantage (HA) was calculated as the percentage of total home points scored relative to overall team points, while home winning percentage (HW) was determined by the percentage of home wins out of total home games.

• Results: Male teams exhibited a significantly higher home advantage (HA) of 62.80% compared to female teams at 57.86% (p < 0.001). Low-level teams (LLT) had a higher HA (67.93%) than medium-level (MLT) and high-level teams (HLT) by 16.78% and 12.03%, respectively, while HLT showed higher HW (90.84%) compared to MLT (60.23%) and LLT (35.71%).

• Statistical Significance: Statistical analysis revealed that male teams had higher HA across low- and medium-level classifications (p < 0.05), indicating a significant disparity between sexes in lower-ranked teams. For HW, no significant differences were found by sex, suggesting that absolute performance at home is comparable.

• Innovations: This study uniquely examined the interplay of sex and team level on both HA and HW, providing insights into how different categories of teams leverage home conditions. The use of cluster analysis for ranking teams based on seasonal performance highlights variations in competitive dynamics.

• Practical Implications: Findings suggest that lower-ranked teams should enhance crowd engagement strategies to maximize home advantage, while higher-ranked teams need to focus on consistent performance both at home and away. Gender-specific strategies are recommended to address the differing impacts of HA in male and female leagues.

Why it matters:

Understanding home advantage (HA) and home winning percentages (HW) in handball provides coaches and athletes with valuable insights into performance strategies. The study found that low-level male teams exhibited a noteworthy reliance on home games, showcasing a HA difference of 16.78% compared to high-level teams.

⚽️ Which Adductor Training Method Boosts Football Strength?

Key finding:

Both low- and high-volume adductor strength training equally improve and maintain hip adduction strength in female football players.

How they did it:

• Methodology: The study involved 52 female football players from Norway's 1st and 2nd divisions, randomly assigned to either a low-volume (220 repetitions) or high-volume (394 repetitions) protocol of the Adductor Strengthening Programme over 8 weeks, with strength measured using isometric hip adductor torque tests at various intervals using the ForceFrame device.

• Results: Isometric hip adduction strength increased for both groups at the end of the 8-week protocol, with the low-volume group showing increases of 0.13 Nm/kg at 0° and 0.22 Nm/kg at 15°, while the high-volume group achieved similar gains (0.13 Nm/kg at 0° and 0.31 Nm/kg at 15°). No significant between-group differences were observed in strength improvement.

• Maintenance: Both groups maintained their strength during a subsequent 10-week maintenance phase, with minimal variation in torque results, reinforcing the efficacy of both training volumes for strength retention.

• Compliance: The average compliance was 84% for the high-volume group and 78% for the low-volume group during the training phase, with players reporting the training load as moderate, suggesting feasibility in integrating the program into regular training.

• Innovation: The study utilized a randomized controlled design and a comprehensive strength measurement approach, facilitating a rigorous comparison of training volumes and highlighting that increased training volume did not yield significantly greater strength gains in female football players, diverging from trends observed in male counterparts.

Why it matters:

These findings highlight that both high and low-volume protocols of the Adductor Strengthening Programme effectively enhance isometric hip adduction strength in female football players, with both groups showing an increase of around 13% at 0° and 22% at 15° hip abduction over eight weeks. Coaches can utilize these insights to tailor training plans without overloading their players, reassuring them that even a lower volume can maintain strength and potentially reduce the risk of groin injuries.

Biomechanics

🏃‍♂️ How Compression Shorts Boost Your Downhill Run!

-Compression garments significantly reduce soft tissue vibrations during downhill running, decreasing delayed neuromuscular impairments.

Biomechanics

🧠 The Surprising Truth About Low-Back Pain and Movement

-Chronic low-back pain leads to increased trunk instability, but pain intensity and chronicity do not affect lumbo-pelvic posture.

Biomechanics

🏉 How Rugby Contact Events Vary Between Men and Women

-Rugby contact events are similar across men’s and women’s competitions, but slight variations impact player exposure and risk.

Gender and Sex Differences in Sport

🏔️ Does the Menstrual Cycle Affect Athletic Performance?

-The menstrual cycle has minimal impact on sports performance in trained women during acute high-altitude hypoxia.

Injury

🤾‍♂️ What Danish Adolescent Handball Players Are Hiding?

-Nearly a quarter of Danish youth handball players experience health problems, with females facing higher injury rates than males.

Physical Education and Pedagogy

🏫 What You Didn’t Know About Rural School PE Programs

-Rural physical education is often viewed negatively, highlighting the need for more positive research perspectives and international studies.

Physical Education and Pedagogy

🏓 How Digital Tech Boosts Your Table Tennis Game

-Digital teaching models enhance table tennis skills and fitness in university students, leveraging multimedia and emerging technologies.

Physical Education and Pedagogy

🏫 How Moving More Can Boost Kids’ Smarts!

-Integrating physical activity in schools enhances students’ cognitive performance and promotes their overall health.

Sleep

🛌 Why Sleep Deprivation Sabotaged This Athlete’s Success

-Severe sleep deprivation was a key factor in a Division I athlete’s injury, highlighting the importance of sleep in sports recovery.

Sport Psychology

🏋️‍♂️ How to Boost Your Workout Motivation Instantly

-Aligning personal goals with exercise messaging significantly enhances emotional engagement and increases actual physical activity.